Daniel Leeder


The Hidden Costs of "Heroics" in Engineering Teams

In many organizations, the engineer who repeatedly swoops in to "save the day" during a crisis is often lauded. While their efforts might seem admirable, especially to non-technical leaders, this pattern of "heroing" frequently hinders long-term progress and masks deeper issues.

When one person consistently resolves critical issues – especially if those issues stem from problems they may have inadvertently helped create – it highlights systemic weaknesses. It forces us to ask a critical question: If only one person understands or can fix a critical part of the system, how resilient and scalable is that system truly?

Reliance on heroes often leads to several negative consequences:

The Solution: Build Teams of Proactive Problem Solvers

Instead of celebrating individual heroics, the focus should be on building robust systems and empowered teams:

This approach not only strengthens the system's resilience and scalability but also fosters a more fulfilling, collaborative, and sustainable environment for everyone involved, ultimately driving better and more predictable outcomes. True strength lies in the team and the system, not in individual heroics.